Monday, October 29, 2012

Introduction to Key Skills in Online Business Studies - Becky Donohue

With the high number of adults returning to education in order to make themselves more employable in today's competitive jobs market, business studies has been one of the subjects studied in the UK that has seen the biggest growth. Skills such as project management, marketing and business planning are typically available to specialize in on such courses - and their importance to potential employers continues to increase. Yet, there are a number of key skills associated with business studies online too.

The UK's Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (QAA) is responsible for publishing guidelines on what should be learned on the country's university degrees - in order to ensure that certain standards are met by all institutions. When it comes to General Business and Management, "Graduates are expected to be able to demonstrate a range of cognitive and intellectual skills together with techniques specific to business and management. They should also demonstrate relevant personal and interpersonal skills."

Communication skills development is therefore key to online business studies. This will typically be studied in its varying forms, including written and oral communication, and will also focus on the different ways communication should be undertaken internally, i.e. to other colleagues and workers, and externally to clients and customers. Notions of company and individual voice are prevalent in this area, as well as growing types of media such as social networking and other uses of the internet for communication.

Following this, there are some basic skills that will likely be learned in reference to the general workings of the business, including researching, processing and using data. Consequently, the study of basic numerical methods to calculate averages and measurements will likely be studied, as well as methods for analysis of data via graphs and tables. It is a key skill to not only be able to gather data efficiently, but also to make sense of it and to use it to inform the future of your work.

Unsurprisingly, the presentation of data is also a key skill in business. This includes static presentation via documents (text, pictures, diagrams and graphs), as well as basic presentation skills in terms of preparation, planning and delivery - as well as the use of visual aids including slides, video and programs such as PowerPoint.

Business studies online is a fantastic way to learn the above key skills and more in a flexible, accessible and affordable way.

Source: http://beckydonohue.blogspot.com/2012/10/introduction-to-key-skills-in-online.html

brandon marshall ryder cup Kate Middleton Bottomless the Pirate Bay Hotel Transylvania looper eagles

Vegan Showdown: Vegan MoFo 28: Getting Down to the Wire

I have to say that today is the first day that I'm actively searching for post topics. I really only need two more - since I know what's happening on the 30th and 31st. With everyone in Baltimore kinda squirrely about Hurricane Sandy, I definitely don't want to venture to the store again, so I can't be too adventurous.

I'm sort of ruing not owning Vegan Unplugged: A Pantry Cuisine Cookbook and Survival Guide. It's not that I don't feel like I can deal with the incoming storm - between my parents and my boyfriend, I know that not having emergency supplies on hand is not worth the talkings-to. (My mom called today to be sure I had batteries). However, I like to read themed food books, and now would be a particularly good time for a review. Looking at reviews now, I see that a lot of people talk about its utilities in day-to-day emergencies, which is appealing.

Incidentally, when I was searching for the link for the book, I found these emergency food kits that are vegan friendly. Plus they're Coastguard-approved, which is one of the few endorsements I find exciting enough to pay attention to.

One thing the Coastguard should endorse are these Brussels sprouts from 500 Vegan Recipes. They're crazy easy to make, and the perfect solution when you've bought 2 lbs. of the damned things at the farmers' market with no real plans on what to do with them. I was out of agave, so I used barley malt, and I think I'll stick with that. It really worked and kept the sweetness subtle. I also opted for hot horseradish mustard over Dijon. That was also awesome.


If I've learned anything from MoFo this year, it's that I need to use 500 Vegan Recipes more often.

Source: http://veganshowdown.blogspot.com/2012/10/vegan-mofo-28-getting-down-to-wire.html

2012 oscar nominations kyle williams florida debate rand paul mark kirk florida gop debate freddie mac

Getting The Best Deal When Buying A Home | Travel

Pressure if the last thing you need when you find yourself along the way of getting a house. You are able to steer clear of several of that anxiety, by learning more about the house buying approach. In the following article, you might be provided some tips that is meant to aid simplicity a few of your stress.

The periods an region activities can be an benefit on the real estate marketplace and an essential thing to consider if investing in a residence for rental fees. Areas that stay hot throughout the year might get more tenants than a location with seasonal everywhere temps.
sell house fast
Go to www.realestate-investinginfo.com to acquire a excellent info and knowledge on purchase methods and techniques. Possessing an abundance of expertise is among the very best tools you might have when it comes to real estate which website gives you a wealth of information you can use and implement from now on purchases.

If you intend on possessing far more youngsters, it is prudent to purchase a residence with additional bed rooms. Often times, individuals tend not to acquire the reality that they could convey more youngsters under consideration when buying a property, and they also will not turn out obtaining the space for expanding loved ones.

The proper time for you to invest in a property is always now, supplied you happen to be well prepared. Rates fluctuate and so does the industry. Real estate property transactions would be wise to come about when you find yourself prepared, not as soon as the celebrities are aligned. Enough time to get is in case you have completed your research and discovered the home which enables you happy.

While you are prepared to get a property, one of the first issues you want to do to assure that you are currently ready just for this step is to obtain a copy of your credit track record. All house loan organizations will look at this to make a decision in case you are personal loan deserving. If you credit is absolutely poor, make time to shell out fantastic financial debt, and commence residence camping whenever your credit rating is how it must be.

After you have a residence checked out, regardless of whether because the purchaser or the vendor, question another celebration to compare examination effects along with you. Odds are very good that you will have disparities between the results of equally inspections. Looking at final results this way helps to ensure that the two of you know about all potential issues using the residence.

It might be difficult, but don?t fall in love with the very first home that you simply trip. The thought of owning your house will keep most possible customers feeling quite positive, but do your favour by looking at numerous attributes ? although you may feel you may have discovered the supreme home.

For the majority of families the kitchen is the center of the home. Purchasers should look into the size and style, the location and the equipment in the home. Older, outdated the kitchen can be very expensive to up grade and it can add more 1000s of dollars to their budget whilst a roomy kitchen with updated kitchen appliances can drastically reduce the last fees, and might add more joy to the acquisition of your home.

For novice property buyers this process can be daunting so you should think about selecting an agent who can help you combined with the method. A buyer?s professional is wonderful in that they will help you save considerable time and give you entries which meet your distinct requirements.

Stay away from the craziness whilst keeping your sanity by directly using the valuable and existing suggestions which you have just read. Provided that you can put these ideas into measures, you should be able to area and benefit from the best prices out

Source: http://nicoleevaemery.com/real-estate/getting-the-best-deal-when-buying-a-home/

dave matthews ambien wwdc heart attack grill madden 13 cover dalai lama tamera mowry

Friday, October 26, 2012

Dead Trigger Hallowe'en update includes new graveyard level

Android Central
 
Zombie fans, Hallowe'en is your time of the year and the folks at Madfinger Games know it. Their first-person shooter title for Android, Dead Trigger, has been updated with a whole bunch of new content for the season. Here's the caps-ridden changelog. 
  • Visit new arena: HAUNTED GRAVEYARD. It’s the scariest place in the City!
  • Enjoy a new weapon! The CROSSBOW is equipped with blazing ballistics!
  • You’ll now be able to slaughter crowds of HALLOWEEN “PUMPKIN-HEAD” ZOMBIES
  • Don’t forget to get the favorite MINIGUN – provided at a reduced price!
  • BLAST the pumpkin heads and watch them roll around based on realistic physics!
  • Check the new cool games in Bank: MORE APPS
  • AlienGun EFFECT optimization for slower devices
  • Many bug FIXES

How many of y'all are dressing up as zombies this year? Any hardcore Dead Trigger players in the house?



Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/androidcentral/~3/OjHqOwRq6Y8/story01.htm

ncaa final country music awards autism awareness angelman syndrome total recall troy tulowitzki katie couric good morning america

Thursday, October 25, 2012

Guide to Most Popular ETFs - Zacks.com - Zacks Investment Research

The ETF industry has come a long way from the time when the ETFs were first launched as investment tools to gain exposure to different asset classes. Since then, many ETFs came into existence, of which many could not survive in the industry and had to be shut down. So what could be the possible reason behind those ETFs which were launched only to be shut down later?

We can say that ETFs are more about numbers like AUM, volume, number of holdings, etc. So, which one of these numbers keeps an ETF going? Is it asset under management which indicates whether the fund will continue to exist or its average daily volume? (Ten Biggest U.S. Equity Market ETFs)

Undoubtedly volume is an important consideration in the investment process, especially for traders who get in and out of a particular security very frequently. For these traders, high volume levels can help keep bid-ask spreads low and thus reduce the total cost of trading. (Guide to the 25 Most Liquid ETFs)

But it should be noted that a fund?s very existence depends to a large extent on its asset under management. Generally, for a fund asset under management of or over $100 million work as a threshold for any sponsor?s profitability. While big fund houses may be able to run their ETFs with low AUM for years, it becomes really difficult for small fund house.

Although AUM and volume both play crucial roles in any fund?s existence, it is finally the return from the fund which influences any investor?s decision. Still, the funds that have managed to attract a large amount of assets indicate that they are popular with the investors due to their past performance and expectations for future performance. Investors looking to invest in ETFs with very high AUMs (more than 30 billion) as criteria have the following options available.

SPDR S&P 500 (SPY)

Initiated in January 1993, SPY is the king in the ETF world, with the highest asset under management. It manages an asset base of $118.4 billion. The most popular fund among investors, SPY seeks to invest its heavy asset base in a basket of 500 stocks and trades with an average trading volume of about 135 million shares. The fund also has an edge in expenses as it charges a fee of just 0.09% annually. (Guide to the 25 Cheapest ETFs)

The weighting towards the top 10 holdings is also moderate as just 21.4% of the huge asset base goes towards them. This implies that the fund?s asset allocation is not limited to the top 10 holdings but is spread out among other companies as well. ?Apple Inc. (AAPL) takes the top position in the top 10 holdings list with an asset allocation of 4.9%. Among others, the fund does not invest more than 3.3% in any one holding.

Among sector allocation, the fund gives double-digit allocation to the top 5 sectors with information technology being the most preferred sector in the list with an asset allocation of 20.1%.

Vanguard MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (VWO)

This Vanguard ETF looks to tap the growing emerging markets which not only have greater growth potential but also lower correlation with their developed market counterparts. (Three Overlooked Emerging Market ETFs)

This ETF tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Index in order to provide exposure to a basket of stocks across various developing nations. The product has proven to be extremely popular with investors.

The proof is in the $67.1 billion under management in the fund, while trading volume is more than 18 million shares a day. Also, the cost appears to be minimal at 20 basis points, especially when compared to other emerging market ETFs.

In terms of a portfolio, VWO provides access to 902 securities in its basket and does not allocate more than 3.9% to any one stock. This suggests that the product is well diversified from an individual security perspective and is unlikely to face company specific risk. (Three Emerging Market ETFs to Limit BRIC Exposure)

With regard to country exposure, China takes the top spot at 17.3% of assets, followed by 14.4% in Korea, 15.2% in Brazil, and a 10.7% allocation to Taiwan.

SPDR Gold Shares (GLD)

For a bullion-backed approach to gold ETF investing, investors can look to SPDR Gold Shares. GLD is the ETF which is backed by physical metal and holds the metal in the form of bullion or ingots.

Investing through GLD in gold represents a cost-effective and suitable mode for investors. It is expected that the transaction costs for buying and selling the shares will be lower than purchasing, storing and insuring physical gold for most investors (Has The Junior Gold Mining ETF Lost Its Luster?).

This ETF is designed to track the spot price of Gold bullion. GLD ?is an ETF rich in AUM as it has $75.9 billion asset under management and is one of the most liquid options available in gold ETF investing trading with volumes of 7 million a day. The fund charges a fee of 40 basis points annually.

iShares MSCI EAFE Index Fund ETF (EFA)

For investors seeking a broad exposure to developed markets around the world outside of the U.S. and Canada should invest in EFA. EFA tracks the MSCI EAFE Index and provides exposure to companies specifically in Europe, Australia, and the Far East (Seven Biggest International Equity ETFs).

This product manages an asset base of $36.7 billion and is an extremely liquid option available to investors as traded volume on a normal day is more than 14 million. So this product is rich in both AUM and volume.

The fund seeks to invest this asset base in a large basket of 926 stocks and is immune to company specific risk with just 13.4% of assets in the top 10 holdings. Among sector breakdown, the fund is a bit tilted towards financials in which it put in 23.4% of the asset base. Among others the fund does not invest more than 12.3% in any stock.

From a country perspective, United Kingdom takes the top spot at 22.8% of assets, just edging out Japan. The fund charges an expense ratio of 34 basis points on an annual basis.

MSCI Emerging Markets Index Fund (EEM)

For a broad play on the emerging market space, EEM presents a compelling choice to the investors looking to tap the emerging markets (Get True Emerging Market Exposure With These Three ETFs).

The fund managed to build an impressive asset base of $37.4 billion and is also rich in volume trading with volumes of more than 36 million on a normal day. The ETF charges investors 67 basis points in fees for its services. .

It represents a solid pick for long-term investors as it has a well diversified portfolio that doesn?t put more than 3.8% in any one security. Sector exposure, however, is tilted towards financials, information technology, energy and materials where each of them accounts for double-digit allocation.

For countries, China takes the top spot at just about 17% of the total, followed by a 15% allocation to South Korea and a 13% holding in Brazilian firms.

iShares S&P 500 Index Fund (IVV)

Investors seeking for exposure in the large capitalization sector of the U.S. equity market or S&P 500 should look to invest in IVV. IVV trades with an asset base of $32.8 billion.

This produces a product which is home to a large basket of 502 large cap stocks with a spread out holding pattern as it just allocates 21.3% to the top 10 holdings. Apple takes the top spot in the top 10 holdings closely followed by Exxon Mobil and General Electric.

The fund does not appear to be biased towards any particular sector and gives double-digit allocation to almost all the sectors except the last four. The fund also has an edge in expenses as it just charges 9 basis points annually.

Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report >>??

Source: http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/85507/guide-to-most-popular-etfs

torrey smith torrey smith sofia vergara oakland raiders Jessica Lange NFL scores week 3 kat dennings

New EmbroidMe Ownership in Crystal Lake - Franchising.com

The United Franchise Group announces today that the EmbroidMe in Crystal Lake, IL., is under new ownership by resident Janice Means.

Crystal Lake, IL, October 25, 2012 - (PR.com) - EmbroidMe, the world?s largest embroidery franchise, announces a new owner for its Crystal Lake store at 6226 Northwest Hwy, under the ownership of local resident Janice Means.

Before becoming an EmbroidMe franchisee, Means worked in IT in the corporate world, spending the past 14 years at IBM. Means is also the president of Central Music Boosters, a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization to enhance, enrich and support Illinois CCUSD 301?s Vocal and Instrumental Music programs.

?I knew EmbroidMe was the right fit when I mentally started making a potential customer list on the drive home,? says Means.

EmbroidMe in Crystal Lake will have a ribbon cutting ceremony on Friday ? November 16 at 10:00 a.m. They will host an open house on Saturday ? November 17, from 10:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m.

With nearly 400 retail locations, EmbroidMe provides full-service custom embroidery and screen-printing for apparel, as well as promotional products and gifts to both the private and commercial segments of the business community.

For more information on EmbroidMe in Crystal Lake, contact Means at 815-444-1081. For franchising information, please call (800)727-6720 or visit www.embroidme.com.

About United Franchise Group: The Global Leader for Entrepreneurs.

United Franchise Group (http://www.unitedfranchisegroup.com) is a $500-million franchising expert with 30 years of experience and 1,400 franchise locations in over 50 countries. Brands include SIGNARAMA, EmbroidMe, Billboard Connection, Plan Ahead Events, and Transworld Business Advisors. Information on franchising opportunities is available at 800-286-8671 (U.S.) or 001-561-640-5570 (international).

Contact:

United Franchise Group
Mary Mills
561-640-5570
www.unitedfranchisegroup.com

###

Social Reach:

Viewer Response:

Source: http://www.franchising.com/news/20121025_new_embroidme_ownership_in_crystal_lake.html

nfl draft 2012 whitney mercilus 2012 nfl draft picks andrew luck andrew luck trent richardson robert griffin iii

Fed to keep buying bonds despite firmer U.S. growth

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Federal Reserve appears intent to stick to its bond-buying stimulus on Wednesday, having already indicated it would take more than a modest show of economic strength for policymakers to begin taking their foot off the gas.

The Fed unveiled a third round of bond purchases last month to try to rev up a sluggish economic recovery despite a looming presidential election that some thought might deter action.

Now analysts believe the central bank will wait until at least December to make any changes to its current plans to buy $40 billion of mortgage debt per month.

"With the election in two weeks, the Fed will be in a self-imposed quiet mode this week," said Stephen Stanley, an economist at Pierpont Securities, in Stamford, Connecticut. "Look for a statement that has no more than marginal language changes."

Policymakers have already said they will stick to their open-ended plans to buy bonds until the employment outlook improves substantially, and they are expected to reiterate that intention in a statement due around 2:15 p.m. (1815 GMT).

While officials will likely nod to recent signs of a pickup in economic activity emerging in employment and housing, economists agree that the glimmers of a stronger recovery are too few and far between for the Fed to alter its policy course.

Indeed, it is also likely the Fed will repeat that it expects to keep overnight interest rates near zero through at least mid-2015 and that it intends to keep a highly stimulative policy in place "for a considerable time" after the recovery strengthens.

The Fed, which has held rates close to zero since December 2008, had already bought $2.3 trillion in mortgage-related and government debt before it launched its latest round of stimulus.

TALKING THE TALK

Aside from a discussion over the stance of monetary policy, officials look set to debate fine-tuning their communications strategy by adopting numerical thresholds for economic variables that would guide the central bank's unconventional stimulus.

Chicago Federal Reserve Bank President Charles Evans, for instance, has advocated keeping rates near zero until the unemployment rate, currently at 7.8 percent, goes down to 7 percent, as long as inflation does not exceed 3 percent. The central bank formally targets 2 percent inflation.

Policymakers are also strongly considering the adoption of a consensus economic forecast for the central bank as a whole, as opposed to the quarterly individual projections for growth, employment, inflation and interest rates currently published.

But no announcement is likely until at least December, when the Fed releases its next installment of economic estimates and Chairman Ben Bernanke holds a news conference.

"We do not anticipate that an agreement will be reached at this meeting," said Millan Mulraine, senior U.S. economic strategist at TD Securities, in New York. "However, the tone of the accompanying statement should remain exceptionally dovish, with the Fed offering only modest upgrades to the economic assessment and reiterating its commitment to do more if necessary."

The December meeting is also seen as a good time for the Fed to re-evaluate the extent of its monthly bond purchases. In addition to the new program to buy mortgage-backed debt, the Fed has been using proceeds from short-term government securities to buy longer-term ones. That program, known as Operation Twist, expires at the end of the year.

In response to the financial crisis and deep recession of 2007-2009, the Fed launched a series of unconventional policy actions, including its bond purchases. Some analysts have expressed concern about future inflation from the Fed's policies, but price increases have remained tame so far.

The problem is, growth has, too. U.S. gross domestic product grew at an annual rate of just 1.3 percent in the second quarter, not enough to put steady downward pressure on the jobless rate.

Economists expect a report on Friday to show the recovery perked up a bit in the third quarter on the back of stronger retail sales, but there are concerns a looming tightening of U.S. fiscal policy could toss the economy back into recession.

Europe's debt crisis, a key source of concern for the Fed, also remains unresolved, although it is not flaring up too wildly in financial markets, offering comfort that the U.S. economy will escape any contagion.

(Editing by Tim Ahmann and Jan Paschal)

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/fed-keep-buying-bonds-despite-firmer-u-growth-041425787--business.html

christine christine will ferrell double fine adventure turbo tax katharine mcphee cold mountain

U.S. suing BofA for $1B over mortgage losses

The federal government filed a civil lawsuit against Bank of America Corp. (BAC), alleging the second-biggest U.S. bank by assets saddled taxpayers with losses by misrepresenting the quality of home loans it sold to mortgage-finance firms Fannie Mae (FNMA) and Freddie Mac (FMCC) .

The action, filed Wednesday in federal court in Manhattan, seeks at least $1 billion in damages. The filing represents a novel effort by the government to defray costs tied to the 2008 bailout of Fannie and Freddie, and potentially opens a new front against a banking industry already dealing with hefty legal costs.

[More from WSJ.com: College Housing Firms Aim Upscale]

The government alleges Countrywide, which Bank of America acquired in 2008, dismembered quality control and checks on loan quality in 2007 through 2009, in a process called "the Hustle" that aimed to boost the speed at which it originated and sold loans to the companies. The mortgage unit falsely continued to claim the loans qualified for insurance from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the complaint alleges.

A Bank of America spokesman didn't provide immediate comment. Bank of America shares, up 70% this year, were up six cents in midday trading Wednesday at $9.41.

The government is suing Bank of America under the Federal False Claims Act, which has become a popular tool for prosecutors seeking to hold banks accountable for alleged mortgage misdeeds and calls for triple damages when the government can show taxpayers were ripped off.

This is the second suit Preet Bharara, the U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York, has brought against banks it accused of duping the federal insurance programs this month. Two weeks ago, his office sued Wells Fargo & Co. (WFC), the biggest U.S. mortgage company, of recklessly issuing mortgages and leaving the Federal Housing Administration to pick up the tab.

Fannie and Freddie, while backed by taxpayers since the 2008 bailout, aren't part of the government. Previous suits have been brought on behalf of government agencies such as Medicare and the FHA.

Fannie and Freddie were publicly traded entities before their market funding evaporated in the early stages of the financial crisis, forcing their effective nationalization. Taxpayers have since poured $142 billion into the companies, which along with other government agencies financed nine out of 10 home loans written last year. Fannie and Freddie don't make loans but guarantee regular principal and interest payments to mortgage-bond investors.

[More from WSJ.com: J.P. Morgan Gets Stung by China Downturn]

Wednesday's suit was also brought under a federal statute known as the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act, which was enacted in 1989 following a wave of bank failures triggered by the savings-and-loan crisis.

Last year Fannie's and Freddie's regulator, the Federal Housing Finance Agency, sued 18 major banks including Bank of America, accusing them of violating federal securities law and other laws in the sale of residential private-label mortgage-backed securities. The seven biggest U.S. commercial banks have recognized or set aside $76 billion in mortgage-related legal costs since 2008, according to analysts at Credit Suisse Group (CSGN.VX).

Fannie Mae stopped buying or guaranteeing new loans delivered by Bank of America this past February amid an impasse over billions in defaulted mortgages that Fannie said Bank of America was obligated to repurchase. Negotiations over resolving the dispute are ongoing, according to both parties.

Bank of America briefly became Fannie's top client following its acquisition of Countrywide. It accounted for 20% of all loans Fannie bought or backed in 2009, but that share had fallen below 10% by the third quarter of 2011, and below 3% in the fourth quarter, according to Inside Mortgage Finance.

[More from WSJ.com: How to Revamp Fannie, Freddie]

The action isn't Bank of America's first False Claims Act suit. In February, Bank of America agreed to a $1 billion settlement of False Claims Act fraud allegations tied to Federal Housing Administration-backed loans brought by the Eastern District of New York. The bank settled without admitting wrongdoing. Three other large banks have agreed to pay a total of more than $490 million in similar cases, each accepting responsibility for "certain conduct."

The suit follows in a long line of legal headaches for Bank of America. Last month, the bank agreed to pay $2.43 billion to settle claims it misled investors about the acquisition of brokerage firm Merrill Lynch & Co., the largest settlement of a shareholder claim by a financial-services firm since the upheaval of 2008 and 2009.

The lawsuits continue to underscore how the hasty acquisitions made during the height of the financial crisis by Kenneth Lewis, then the bank's chief executive, still haunt it today. Decisions to buy mortgage lender Countrywide and Merrill have forced Bank of America, run since 2010 by Chief Executive Brian Moynihan, to shoulder some $42 billion in litigation expenses, payouts and reserves, according to company figures.

More from WSJ.com:
Mortgage Rule Compromise Endorsed By Top Economist
The Art of Calling In Sick?Or Not
What's Selling Where | Dog Costumes

Source: http://finance.yahoo.com/news/u-s--sues-bofa-for--1-billion-over-mortgage-losses-24401588.html

blunt amendment justin bieber birthday read across america vikings stadium breitbart dead db cooper fafsa

Bay Area Startups Await Crowdfunding Regulation

This article comes to us courtesy of The Bay Citizen.

By Matt Drange

How much online advertising is too much?

That's one of the questions before the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission as it finalizes regulations to let companies to raise money from investors through crowdfunding.

The advertising regulations are one of a slew of issues the SEC must address in order to implement the federal Jumpstart Our Business Startups (JOBS) Act, which includes a provision that will allow startups to raise money by selling shares to investors through websites known as funding portals.

The JOBS Act, signed by President Barack Obama in April, attempts to adapt the popular idea of Internet crowdfunding to the sophisticated business of selling securities.

The SEC's rules are eagerly awaited by some high-tech and financial startups in the Bay Area, which would be able to sell shares without restrictions enacted over the years to protect na?ve investors from throwing their money away.

Visit The Bay Citizen to read the rest of this story.

"; var coords = [-5, -72]; // display fb-bubble FloatingPrompt.embed(this, html, undefined, 'top', {fp_intersects:1, timeout_remove:2000,ignore_arrow: true, width:236, add_xy:coords, class_name: 'clear-overlay'}); });

Source: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/24/bay-area-startups_n_2007749.html

tim howard scores nick cannon kidney failure consumer financial protection bureau casey anthony video recess appointment eastman kodak eastman kodak

Wednesday, October 24, 2012

Sen. Scott Brown: Washington needs moderates

Spinners and Winners

The Massachusetts senate race is one of the most important to Republicans keen on recapturing control of the Senate. But incumbent GOP Sen. Scott Brown says it doesn't much matter to him which party wins the majority in Washington.

"For me it doesn't really matter who's in charge," says the junior senator, who adds the real problem is the dwindling number of moderate Democrats and Republicans in the Senate.

"You still need to get to 60 votes," says Brown. "I'm tired of the gridlock. It makes me just so disgusted to walk in there and see, you know, the usual spotting on votes on both sides."

Brown says if Republicans gain control of the Senate, Sen. Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., the current minority leader, will still have to "earn my vote."

"I'm not going to be happy with the gridlock that we've had, so I'm going to wait and see and see who emerges, see if anyone's going to challenge him, and then I'll figure it out," says the junior senator, who agrees that McConnell bears some of the blame for the constant obstruction.

Brown's Democratic challenger is Elizabeth Warren, who enjoyed early support from Democrats thanks to a?video of her speaking on fair taxation and debt.

"There is nobody in this country who got rich on his own. Nobody," Warren says in the video, which appeared online late last year. "You built a factory out there, good for you, but I want to be clear, you moved your goods to market on the roads the rest of us paid for; you hired workers the rest of us paid to educate; you all were safe in your factory because of police forces and fire forces that the rest of us paid for."

Brown says that video has helped his campaign.

"It's actually galvanized the small business owners and the people that are out there working hard and getting up in the middle of the night or early in the morning and providing services. Third, fourth, fifth generation businesses, they're deeply offended and they're voting for me."

For more on Sen. Scott Brown, including the junior senator's views on the Supreme Court, and banning outside groups such as SuperPACs from this Massachusetts senate race, check out today's Spinners and Winners. And check out tomorrow's episode for an interview with Brown's challenger, Elizabeth Warren.

ABC News' Sunlen Miller contributed to this episode.

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/power-players-abc-news/sen-scott-brown-doesn-t-matter-republicans-win-110810615.html

censored jerry yang stop sopa justified southland sopa blackout protect ip act

WWE Bands we?d like to see

As we all know, Rock ?n? Wrestling have a proud and longstanding partnership between WWE and musical luminaries like Ray Charles, Alice Cooper, Ozzy Osbourne, Alter Bridge, Motorhead, Cyndi Lauper and the one and only Aretha Franklin. That history continues to this day as Heath Slater, Drew McIntyre and Jinder Mahal make, well, not exactly?beautiful?music together as the newly formed 3MB.

Actually, come to think of it, they haven?t even technically made ... music ... together, at all.

Right. Anyway ...

What can?t be denied is the presence felt in the wake of the numerous attacks (all on the rise) on Superstars, all administered by 3MB. It?s a presence that has the WWE Universe buzzing about what is, quite possibly, the strangest (faux) musical trio ever assembled inside (and maybe even outside) the squared circle.

So, with the unexpected emergence of 3MB as players on the WWE stage, WWE.com takes a look at 10 other potential Superstar bands.

View Comments

Source: http://www.wwe.com/shows/smackdown/WWE-bands-we%E2%80%99d-like-to-see

jon huntsman bit coin huntsman w.e. episodes idris elba kelsey grammer

GOP candidates in close races disavow rape remark

(AP) ? Republicans locked in close races ? from Mitt Romney to Massachusetts Sen. Scott Brown ? on Wednesday disavowed Indiana Senate candidate Richard Mourdock's comment that when a woman becomes pregnant during a rape, "that's something God intended." Other Republicans also immediately distanced themselves from the tea party-backed Mourdock.

The Republican hopeful told reporters Wednesday that he meant only that God creates life, and that rape is evil. But there was no taking back the remark, which suddenly pushed the issue of rape and abortion back to the political forefront just as Romney and the GOP had cut into President Barack Obama's substantial advantage with female voters. Democrats seized on the comment and called on Romney to withdraw his endorsement for Mourdock and pull his ad now airing in Indiana on behalf of the Senate candidate.

"It is perplexing that he wouldn't demand to have that ad taken down," Obama campaign spokeswoman Jennifer Psaki told reporters.

The campaign said the president found Mourdock's comments "outrageous and demeaning to women" and said the assertions were "a reminder that a Republican Congress working with a Republican President Mitt Romney would feel that women should not be able to make choices about their own health care."

The National Republican Senatorial Committee stood by Mourdock, but GOP Sen. Kelly Ayotte of New Hampshire canceled a planned trip to campaign with the candidate Wednesday and issued a statement saying she disagreed with him. Rep. Mike Pence, who is running for governor in Indiana, also rejected the comment and urged Mourdock to apologize.

On Tuesday night, Mourdock was asked during the closing minutes of a debate whether abortion should be allowed in cases of rape or incest.

"I struggled with it myself for a long time, but I came to realize that life is that gift from God. And, I think, even when life begins in that horrible situation of rape, that it is something that God intended to happen," Mourdock said.

The state treasurer, who unseated six-term Sen. Richard Lugar in the GOP primary, is locked in a close race with Rep. Joe Donnelly.

After the debate, he sought to clarify his comments, issuing a statement saying, "God creates life, and that was my point. God does not want rape, and by no means was I suggesting that he does. Rape is a horrible thing, and for anyone to twist my words otherwise is absurd and sick."

Mourdock's comment recalled GOP Senate candidate Todd Akin's remark this summer about rape and pregnancy. Akin said in an August interview that women's bodies have ways of preventing pregnancy in cases of "legitimate rape." Republicans, led by Romney, called for Akin to abandon the race, but he refused and is pressing ahead against Democratic Sen. Claire McCaskill.

It was unclear whether the self-inflicted political wounds by Mourdock and Akin decide their elections on Nov. 6 in Republican-leaning states. But the comments are clearly problematic for candidates like Brown, who is struggling to hold onto his seat against Democrat Elizabeth Warren.

"Scott Brown is pro-choice and does not agree with the views expressed by Richard Mourdock. They do not reflect his thinking at all," Alleigh Marre, a spokeswoman for Brown, said in a statement.

___

Associated Press Andrew Miga contributed to this report.

Associated Press

Source: http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/89ae8247abe8493fae24405546e9a1aa/Article_2012-10-24-Republicans-Abortion/id-418b31ca9f63474697deef370cfabc29

april 16 tornadoes mitch hedberg secret service scandal shea weber greystone sidney crosby

Amazon Studios at AFF | A ton of useful information about ...

Amazon Studios has been a much-discussed topic on both the blog and the podcast. Last week at the Austin Film Festival, the company made a presentation explaining how they work with screenwriters.

Reader Mike attended and took notes, which he generously offered to write up.


first personA little bit about my background: I started out working at a production company as an intern and as a reader, kept working at writing and eventually got representation from a manager and an agent. I?ve had scripts go out and I?ve done the studio water bottle tour a couple of times, but have yet to earn a single penny as a writer.

I consider myself in that grey, ugly pool of zombie writers: Part alive, but mostly dead inside.

I?m guessing the crowd ranged from people like me to those who are thinking about writing their first screenplays. I had heard a lot things about Amazon (including on the podcast), so I went in with an ass-load of skepticism along with a tiny bit of hope. Unfortunately, very little during the panel moved the skeptic needle, and it pretty much pissed all over the hope.

Again, I can only speak for myself.

First, it wasn?t really a panel. There was one Dude at a podium, so it was more like a new-hire presentation at Dundler Mifflin rather than a Q&A with a studio exec. The Dude, head of development at Amazon Studios I think, seemed nice enough and intelligent enough, but he used the phrase ?I?d rather not get into the details of that? way too often for my tastes.

Bullet points:

  • Writers can upload their scripts to the Amazon Studios site as a non-WGA writer, or if they are WGA they can have their rep upload.
  • Once a writer uploads his script, he cannot sell his script to anyone for 45 days. Essentially a free 45-day option.
  • If Amazon is interested, they will option the script for a period of 18 months for $10k.
  • If that script goes into production, the writer will be paid $200k, with some other pay-outs if the film reaches certain financial milestones.
  • They also have open writing assignments from time to time, and these are handled much the same way, with writers submitting their work on the website for consideration for the gig.

All of this is well and good on the surface. I am not a million-dollar-screenwriter by any stretch of the imagination, but I do have some access to the lords of Hollywood. If I didn?t have anywhere to go with my scripts, I would probably be interested in what the Dude had to say. However, once he said they have somewhere around 10,000 submissions with 22 projects in development, it doesn?t take a Harvard grad to do the math and realize your odds are just as good in the traditional studio system.

The things that I found puzzling were mainly around their development process and their overall plan.

The Dude explained their development process by talking about information studios gather from test screening and how it is used. Basically saying that once you shoot a film, you have a test screening and get feedback from the general public on what they liked and didn?t like about the story, the characters or whatever. Meaning that the problem is that the film is already shot, so there is only so much you can do to alter it.

At Amazon (wait for it) they want to get public feedback (through their website) on the script as it is being developed so they can make changes before they begin shooting. They plan on doing this through several methods. They already have comic books made from a script in development that they are asking for feedback on. They are also thinking of making short videos and other things to get parts of the script out there and gather opinions from Amazon?s customers. The writer will get this info and incorporate it as notes for rewrites. Now, the Dude did say it is up to the writer to do what he wants with these notes. You be the judge on that. On one hand, I?d like to congratulate them on thinking outside the box on development. But I see problems with this, as I?m sure you do as well.

The other problem I had was with their overall plan: There doesn?t seem to be one.

They have a first-look deal with Warner Bros., but when he was asked questions about the deal he defaulted to the ?I?d rather not get into the details of that.? He was asked what type of genres or budget ranges they were looking at, and he didn?t really have an answer. I would have been more impressed if they picked a direction, like saying, ?We want to provide funding for small, independent minded stories that might not get a shot in the Hollywood system,? or saying, ?We are looking for big, tent-pole, event movies.?

I had other concerns, but that was pretty much the thing in a nutshell. I think it great that someone with money is jumping in, and I hope for the best, but it looks like there are problems with hair on them, and I think there are some very rough growing pains in the making.

Source: http://johnaugust.com/2012/amazon-studios-at-aff

news channel 5 nashville weather jason varitek andrew breitbart dead sheriff joe arpaio limbaugh aaron smith

Kickstarter Funded ?Walker ? The Smartest Productivity App for iPhone? Available on Apple?s AppStore


Image representing iPhone as depicted in Crunc...

?

Moreno Valley, CA, October 21, 2012 ?(PR.com)? A stunning productivity app that walks you through your daily grind, now available for iPhone 4 and above.
Available today, Kickstarter funded app ?Walker? aims to hold your hand through your inbox processing making sure your tasks are filed in the most efficient and visible way. It allows productivity beginners to easily get a hang of GTD and experts to get advantage of the fully nested horizons of focus.

Unlike other productivity apps, when the user taps on an inbox task, Walker proceeds to ask him if it is actionable, if the answer is Yes, the user will be presented with 4 options: do the task in 2 minutes with a timer, email the task and file it in a waiting for list (delegate), add the task to his calendar or send it to a next actions list setting the project and context respectively. For non actionable tasks, the user can file them on a waiting for, reference or someday list. Thanks to this process Walker will make sure that the user files the task in the most efficient and visible way.
This great feature, together with nested horizons of focus, today?s calendar list and the ability to add tasks from Siri, iCloud.com or a Mac, makes Walker one of the most helpful apps in the AppStore. Walker is now available for $1.99 in the US and priced accordingly in other regions. The app is available worldwide on the Apple AppStore for iPhone 4 and above in iOS 6. Walker is in active development and it has a lot of features coming soon, like a guided weekly review and sync.

Please visit http://walkerapp.com for more Walker information, including videos and screenshots of the app.

Walker under active development by Raul Rea, an iOS developer working on apps since 2009

40.255816 -76.877265

Like this:

Be the first to like this.

Source: http://thelimemagazine.wordpress.com/2012/10/23/kickstarter-funded-walker-the-smartest-productivity-app-for-iphone-available-on-apples-appstore/

decathlon Honey Boo Boo Child marilyn monroe Nathan Adrian London 2012 Synchronized Swimming London 2012 hurdles Taylor Kinney

"Homeland" gets season three pickup from Showtime

{ttle}

{cptn}","template_name":"ss_thmb_play_ttle","i18n":{"end_of_gallery_header":"End of Gallery","end_of_gallery_next":"View Again"},"metadata":{"pagination":"{firstVisible} - {lastVisible} of {numItems}","ult":{"spaceid":"7664811","sec":""}}},{"id": "hcm-carousel-2120156593", "dataManager": C.dmgr, "mediator": C.mdtr, "group_name":"hcm-carousel-2120156593", "track_item_selected":1,"tracking":{ "spaceid" : "7664811", "events" : { "click" : { "any" : { "yui-carousel-prev" : { "node" : "a", "data" : {"sec":"HCMOL on article right rail","slk":"prev","itc":"1" }, "bubbles" : true, "test": function(params){ var carousel = params.obj.getCarousel(); var pages = carousel._pages; // if same page, don't beacon if(("_ult_current_page" in carousel) && carousel._ult_current_page==pages.cur) return false; // keep track of current position within this closure carousel._ult_current_page = pages.cur; return true; } }, "yui-carousel-next" : { "node" : "a", "data" : {"sec":"HCMOL on article right rail","slk":"next","itc":"1" }, "bubbles" : true, "test": function(params){ var carousel = params.obj.getCarousel(); var pages = carousel._pages; // no more pages, don't beacon again // if same page, don't beacon if(("_ult_current_page" in carousel) && carousel._ult_current_page==pages.cur) return false; // keep track of current position within this closure carousel._ult_current_page = pages.cur; return true; } } } } } } })); }); Y.later(10, this, function() {(function() { try{ if (Math.floor(Math.random()*10) == 1) { var loc = window.location, decoded = decodeURI(loc.pathname), encoded = encodeURI(decoded), uri = loc.protocol + "//" + loc.host + encoded + ((loc.search.length > 0) ? loc.search + '&' : '?') + "_cacheable=1", xmlhttp; if (window.XMLHttpRequest) xmlhttp = new XMLHttpRequest(); else xmlhttp = new ActiveXObject("Microsoft.XMLHTTP"); xmlhttp.open("GET",uri,true); xmlhttp.send(); } }catch(e){} })(); }); Y.later(10, this, function() {Y.namespace("Media").ywaSettings = '"projectId": "10001256862979", "documentName": "", "documentGroup": "", "ywaColo" : "vscale3", "spaceId" : "7664811" ,"customFields" : { "12" : "classic", "13" : "story" }'; Y.Media.YWA.init(Y.namespace("Media").ywaSettings); }); Y.later(10, this, function() {if(document.onclick===YAHOO.Media.PreventDefaultHandler.newClick){document.onclick=YAHOO.Media.PreventDefaultHandler.oldClick;} }); }); });

Army opens Manpack and Rifleman Radio competitions | Defense ...

Army leaders announced Monday they will open the Rifleman and Manpack Radio competitions Monday with the defense industry eager to tackle a contract that could yield a multi-billion dollar purse as the Army looks to reinvigorate their aging communications architecture.

The Army has listed its Network and communications systems as the service?s top modernization priority. The Pentagon canceled the Joint Tactical Radio System. Army officials, however, look to salvage the Rifleman and Manpack Radio systems that fell under JTRS.

General Dynamics has received an order from the Army for 3,726 Manpacks. Army officials have ordered another 19,327 Rifleman Radios splitting the order between General Dynamics and Thales.

Despite the orders, the Army chose to open the competition to bidders. Army leaders said on the floor at the Association of the U.S. Army that they have not lost faith in either General Dynamics or Thales to build the radios, but its in the best interests of the Army to review as many offers as possible.

Heidi Shyu, the Army?s acquisition chief, has made clear her desire to instill as much competition as possible in order to save money.

The Manpacks have also already run into problems in testing at the White Sands Missile Range where the Army holds the Network Integration Evaluation. Independent Pentagon testers found the Manpacks didn?t hold up in simulated combat conditions. General Dynamics contends the conditions were too extreme with the multitude of radios in the desert causing problems with all radios in the area.

A host of companies are expected to bid to build the two radio systems to include BAE Systems, Harris as well as General Dynamic and Thales. With so few defense contracts up for bid, this one will draw a considerable amount of attention.

Source: http://defensetech.org/2012/10/22/army-opens-manpack-and-rifleman-radio-competitions/

mega mill power ball april fools pranks livan hernandez soledad o brien mega ball lottery winner

Tuesday, October 23, 2012

Why You Believe Most Everything You Read or Watch on TV

Why You Believe Most Everything You Read or Watch on TVThe saying goes "don't believe everything you read" (or read on the internet or watch on TV) because we often do and we generally shouldn't. How are we so easily duped when we supposedly know better? Psychologist Dr. Douglas LaBier points to a study that posits our brains are just that lazy:

So, what happens within our minds and emotions that make us receptive to lies, and then resistant to information that exposes the truth? A study led by Stephan Lewandowsky of the University of Western Australia explains part of what may happen. The researchers found that "Weighing the plausibility and the source of a message is cognitively more difficult than simply accepting that the message is true ? it requires additional motivational and cognitive resources."

Basically, when presented with the option of fact-checking every statement made by a politician or newscaster, our brains just make a snap decision because it's easier. If the argument seems convincing, our brains like to believe it. Of course, we have our biases, and that plays into the problem as well. We like to be right and hear things that affirm our existing beliefs?another fun problem known as confirmation bias. David McRaney, author of the book and blog You Are Not So Smart, explains:

Confirmation bias is seeing the world through a filter, thinking selectively. The real trouble begins when confirmation bias distorts your active pursuit of facts. Punditry is a whole industry built on confirmation bias. Rush Limbaugh and Keith Olbermann, Glenn Beck and Arianna Huffington, Rachel Maddow and Ann Coulter ? these people provide fuel for beliefs, they pre-filter the world to match existing world-views. If their filter is like your filter, you love them. If it isn't, you hate them.

So how do you make your brain actually care about taking the truth? That's not good news, either, as it involves making you brain work?something it clearly hates to do. The easiest method, however, is to consider a person's perspective in addition to their opinion or advice. This way you can at least consider a bias. Additionally, it helps to hear multiple sides of the argument so you have many perspectives. Of course, if you want to fact-check any controversial statements, we've got a guide to help you out. None of these options are easy, but if you want the truth you have to force your brain to work a little harder.

Why You're Likely To Believe Political Lies! | Psychology Today

Title image by Jonathan Kurten and Brian A Jackson (Shutterstock).

Source: http://feeds.gawker.com/~r/lifehacker/full/~3/RDwTXXIV1zg/why-you-believe-most-everything-you-read-or-watch-on-tv

fred thompson red hook romney tax return the tree of life movie academy award nominees 2012 2012 oscar nominations kyle williams

Hazel Mary Alexander, Frostproof, Florida

Sorry, Readability was unable to parse this page for content.

Source: http://abcactionnews.tributes.com/show/Hazel-Mary-Alexander-94630652

morgan freeman cbs sports adam sandler cbs College Football Scoreboard redskins nfl scores

How To Make The Right Health Insurance Decision | Bwpco

There are a lot of people who wait until it is too late to get health insurance. For many people, this happens because they tend to not think about it when they are healthy, or perhaps they do not understand it, but mainly it is because it?s just an added expense. This article has information on the matter that should keep you informed.

TIP! Before purchasing health insurance, make sure you know about everything that you will be required to pay yourself. Take into account all costs, such as your monthly premium, deductibles, co-pays and any other fees.

You need to review your health insurance policy to see if any prescriptions are covered in the policy. The list of prescriptions covered changes every year, so read it over each time you renew your policy to see what is and isn?t covered.

Credit Card

TIP! Do your research and calculate your costs if you are thinking about purchasing individual health insurance. Don?t buy a policy until you calculate the total of all of the associated expenses.

Save money by never paying your health insurance premiums with your credit card. Certain companies charge you an additional 15 percent for using a credit card. They could also add on an administration fee.

If you?re considering getting a policy with an HMO, but you like your current doctor, ask him which company he is affiliated with. You can avoid switching doctors if you choose a network your current doctor belongs to.

TIP! For those whose vision is already impaired eye care coverage is a must. Vision insurance can cover a majority of your checkup costs as well as the costs of any frames, lenses or contacts you may need.

It is often to your advantage to find a group that you can align yourself with when choosing a health policy. A group insurance should be cheaper than an individual policy. If you are working, your company is probably able to secure group rates for employees. Alternatively, various trade groups, alumni associations and other organizations may offer members group health insurance.

Many people do not have the income to pay for complete health insurance coverage. If you are one of these people, but still want some level of health insurance, obtaining a health insurance policy that protects you from catastrophic events could be an effective and affordable alternative. It?s a great addition to your portfolio too as extra coverage for extreme circumstances.

TIP! If your company offers wellness discounts, do them! Insurers commonly offer discounts on things like gym memberships, smoking cessation aids, weight-loss consultations, flu shots, and nutritional classes. Utilize these benefits as much as possible because you may be rewarded with lower insurance premiums, as well.

If you do not visit the doctor very much, you should look into starting an HSA, or Healthcare Savings Account. This allows a person to save money pre-tax in an account to be used for medical expenses later. The premium savings from a high deductible can go into the account, for example.

Health Insurance

TIP! Be sure to take a close look at your needs and concerns when it comes to your open enrollment period. Even if a certain plan fit you well in the past, your needs may have changed, thus, you need different coverage.

There are lots of different options available with different health insurance plans. Prior to meeting your insurance agent, or setting up health insurance through work, know all of your options. Be certain you completely understand everything before making a final choice.

Is there something about your medical coverage that you are curious or confused about? Your questions could be answered with a simple phone call. Pretty much all health insurance providers have a phone number that you can call and speak with a customer service representative about your policy. You can find out details about your policy much easier than trying to research on your own.

TIP! It?s cheaper for the company you work for to get group health insurance than it is for you to purchase your own, so your premiums through your employer?s plan will be cheaper, even if your coverage is the same. A great way to get group insurance rates is to become a member of a trade organization with the option for insurance.

Health insurance policies have a long list of different coverage options, requiring you to do some homework and be very detailed and organized in your approach to selecting a policy. As you begin, be certain to have your paperwork close at hand, be ready to honestly assess your health care priorities, and make sure to review multiple carriers prior to choosing the company best able to provide the services you need.

It is very important to thoroughly read your insurance policy, so that you know exactly what services it does and does not cover. It can be costly if you see a doctor that is out of the network.

TIP! If you don?t, insurance companies could dismiss your enrollment or deny a claim just because you gave some wrong information. Read your entire enrollment package before you begin filling out your paperwork.

Reading the handbook for your health insurance policy will keep you informed for any future occurrences. This is the best way to get a clear idea of everything covered by your policy and find out more about the advantages linked to it. This might seem boring or overwhelming, but you never know when you?ll need to take advantage of particular benefits.

Health Insurance

TIP! If you are seeing a doctor whom you like and trust, you should try your best to get a health insurance policy that covers your visits to him. You can ask you doctor if they are partnered with any specific insurance company to save you time.

The more you know about health insurance, the wiser a decision you can make. Learn all you can so that you can get an affordable health insurance package that meets all your family?s needs. Health insurance is of the utmost importance, and you should learn all you can about it. Obtaining the right health insurance is crucial. Determining which health insurance policy to obtain is one of the most important decisions you have to make.

Related posts:

  1. Advice For Health Insurance And Why It?s A Must
  2. Good Advice To Know When Purchasing Health Insurance
  3. Health Insurance Tips That Are Practical And Easy
  4. Hard Time Understanding Health Insurance? This Guide Is For You!
  5. Useful Advice For Choosing The Best Health Insurance Plan

Source: http://www.bwpco.com/how-to-make-the-right-health-insurance-decision/

doug fister rick warren the perfect storm hard boiled eggs sound of music mickelson how to tie a tie

Jake Chessum Interview

Jake Chessum is a photographer you will find near the top of all photo editor lists and that?s why I?m so excited he will be joining me Fri, Oct 26, 2012 from 1:30 PM to 3:30 PM for a panel discussion on ?Making a Career in Editorial Photography? at the Photo Plus Expo in NYC. I had the opportunity recently to sit down with him at his studio and discuss his career.

APE: Let?s start at the beginning. When did you first get interested in photography?

Jake Chessum: I was 17 years old and I went to see an exhibition by the British photographer John French. I clearly remember going home and saying to my mum, ?I want to a photographer.? I had been taking my own pictures for about a year before that, but this was the first time I clearly remember deciding on a career.

But before that, my dad worked for this company that would hire photographers and he used to work with this guy, Chris Morris. This guy always seemed glamorous. He had a sports car and he lived in Holland Park, which is super fancy West London.

Because of this my dad had access to photography. He?d always had an old Pentax 35mm camera when we went on family holidays, and he would shoot black and white and come home with enlarged 16 by 20 contact sheets and massive fiber based prints of all our holiday snaps and our personal photos. This was from when I was about 6 or 7 years old onwards.

APE: You?re kidding. He would make enlarged contact sheets? Why would he do that?

Jake: He enjoyed taking pictures, and because he could. He worked for Wates, which was a home building company and they had a photography budget to shoot an internal magazine, and pictures of the new developments.

APE: So, he?d take in the vacation film as well?

Jake: They were really good photographs. And it was mostly black and white. That?s what probably sparked it. I liked to see prints and see photography.

At the time I was at an all boys private school in Croydon where art wasn?t considered a career path, but when I was 16 I moved to another school where art education was taken more seriously. There were a couple of art teachers there who were really enthusiastic and really encouraging and made it seem like it was a real proposition to make a career out of it. They?d been to art school in Central London.

APE: So, you decided to go to art school in London?

Jake: There was an art school in our town but it was rubbish so we all realized that we didn?t want to go there, so had to put a terrible portfolio in or concoct an excuse why you had to go to one of the London art schools.

APE: How does that work? I don?t understand. Do you automatically get to go to school?

Jake: No your portfolio had to be accepted.

APE: So you would give the local school a crap portfolio?

Jake: That is what the smart people did but I went by the rules. I put in a good portfolio and got in but then I wrote to the local council and explained that they didn?t have a good textile department and I wanted to be a textile designer and this school was not going to give me the opportunities. Miraculously they believed me, as it was a lie. So I was able to attend The Central School of Art and Design (now Central St. Martins) for my Foundation Course.

APE: Did you know that you had a talent for photography? Was it evident then?

Jake: I guess. A decent part of my portfolio was photography. I did this project where I went day and night taking photographs on Chelsea Bridge, and I showed this work to my tutor and she told me, it?s very difficult to define what makes a good photograph, but you know what it is, you can do it. And I thought wow, really? [laughs]

That was ?86 and I remember I started buying The Face and Vogue when I was 16, because I was really into magazine design. So, when it came to choosing a degree, I?d looked at photography courses, but they were all kind of ridiculous, because to make it a valid educational qualification, they had to give it this kind of bogus scientific basis or some kind of quantifiable, gradable quality.

It was all based on technique and technical stuff, and I knew I wasn?t particularly interested in that side of it. I was more interested in the images, making the images. I didn?t really care to be graded on black-and-white printing or that aspect of it. So, I thought the next best thing was the graphic design course at St. Martin?s which had a photography unit, so that?s what I went for.

APE: So, you went into graphic design.

Jake: Yes, I did a graphic design degree kind of knowing that I wanted to do photography. But the great thing about St. Martin?s at that time was it was kind of a free-for-all, do you know what I mean? After the first year I was really unhappy because I was following the course, trying to do the projects and failing miserably. But by the second year a couple of friends and I worked out that if we just went down to the basement darkroom and printed, no one would bother us.

APE: [laughs]

Jake: I mean, it was very vague. They would set a project, and you would either do it or not, and I decided not to [laughs].

APE: But, if you didn?t do the project didn?t you fail?

Jake: You didn?t really get into trouble. I don?t know how I didn?t get into trouble, really. But everything was judged on the end of year show, and I always had a lot of work to show. At my second year show I put up photographs and some type designs. One of my fellow students, Graham Wood (now of Tomato) told me he thought I should ditch the typography and stick to photography. Good advice.

But it was definitely laissez-faire. And I remember people thought that I didn?t do any work all year, but it was because they never saw me because I was in the darkroom all year. I was just standing in the darkroom after taking pictures of whatever on the street, or portraits. I cast a few people in the school that I?d seen around just to try and just get together a portfolio. I also did tests with models as St. Martin?s was in Covent Garden where all the model agencies were.

APE: So school gave you an opportunity to just take pictures?

Jake: It was an amazing time. Now I?ll get calls from people once in awhile saying ?What should I do, Should I stay in college or should I get a job?? It?s difficult to advise them to do what I did, because college was free then. I left college in London with a debt of 800 pounds. It?s nothing. So for me?

APE: And three years of taking pictures?

Jake: Yeah, three years of freedom and it was free. It was paid for by the government.

APE: Amazing. That still happens?

Jake: No, now I think you have to pay 9,000 pounds a year. But even that?s nothing compared to here in America.

APE: Do they produce a lot of photographers, is your country just swarming with photographers?

Jake: No, no, and again, it was so long ago, this is 1990 and there were a lot of magazines, like the Face, Arena, ID and Blitz. They had no budget and they attracted up and coming people who were willing to work for pictures because they gave you creative freedom.

APE: Right.

Jake: It was a great era. There we so many photographers starting out at that time who are still really successful: Craig McDean, Richard Burbridge, Glen Luchford, David Sims, Juergen Teller, the late Corrine Day. It was an amazing era to be a young photographer shooting in London. It really was a very creative period.

APE: Tell me about your first job?

Jake: I put together a degree show in June of 1990 but I had worked for a few people before that because St. Martin?s was in the center of London and there were a lot of people who had studied there and had good jobs so they would come back and throw a couple of bones to the kids at school.

So I did a few shoots for short-lived magazines. Actually, the day the degree show opened, Phil Bicker gave me my first ?real? job for The Face, which was to take a train to Macclesfield, which is a kind of grim, northern town and take a picture of a young rapper. I had to get up there as early as possible, shoot the picture and come back to London for the opening of the degree show. I went on my own with a borrowed Pentax 6?7, a 90mm lens, a 135mm lens, a homemade reflector and a few rolls of tri-x.

And The Face actually wrote a piece about me. They did a double-page spread about six graduates from London art schools and they featured me. Which at the time I was completely blase about. Which is funny because now I?d be super-psyched

APE: So, that was your first job. You graduated from school, got a job and got written up.

Jake: And then I?d go and see people with my portfolio, and I got a few calls from that for jobs. And basically, for the first two years I was green as hell. I didn?t know what I was doing. I didn?t know how to run a business, we never had any lessons on running a business, invoicing, nothing.

APE: You just spent all your time in the darkroom.

Jake: Yes, so suddenly you?re like, shit, what do I do? But the amazing thing was, suddenly someone?s saying, oh, can you do this job, it?s 400 pounds a day. That?s still decent money, do you know what I mean?

APE: That was a ton of money for you at the time.

Jake: Then I scored my first ad job off the back of my show, which is bizarre. I got a job for Neutrogena shooting four ads.

APE: Why would they pick somebody who just graduated?

Jake: God bless them, I?ve got no idea. I mean, I think they wanted to use a young photographer. They?d got in a load of books and they got me to do it, and paid me 1500 pounds a day.

APE: Was your work that good back then? If you looked at it now, would you think, OK, there?s some good stuff in there?

Jake: Yes, there are some good pictures. But I didn?t know what I was doing?

APE: As far as running a business?

Jake: Yes, exactly. And running a set, dealing with hair and make up artists, stylists, clients?

APE: You just knew the picture part.

Jake: I?d done a bunch of nudes and portraits of friends, and they were all natural light. But, Jesus. [laughs] I wouldn?t have hired me. I was 23 and green as hell, but I was very enthusiastic.

APE: That was big money.

Jake: Yes, it was 1500 pounds a day for four days at a time when I?d never earned anything. But the funny thing was, they kept saying, we want to do really natural girls, we don?t want these supermodels. So, we did the casting and we cast a 16 year old Kate Moss.

APE: [laughs] No way. That was your first ad job? Kate Moss. Ok, I think there?s some stars aligned for you.

Jake: Yes, maybe.

APE: Something?s going on.

Jake: She was so amazing, she was so charismatic and beautiful. And I remember the casting, because I?d met her like, three or four times. She lived in Croydon where I lived, so I?d bump into her on the train once in a while, although I?m absolutely certain she has no recollection of this. I remember talking to her on the tube platform at Victoria Station one day, I bumped into her and she said, ?I?m sick of this, I?m going to give up, I?m getting nowhere,? which is deeply ironic.

So, at the casting, she came in and saw me and said hello and came over and kissed me on the cheek. And the art director?s like, ?Who?s that girl, how do you know that girl? She?s amazing, how do you know her?? She was obviously something pretty amazing.

So I did that and I was a living at home so I had no rent to pay and I think in my first year I made 25,000 quid, so for the first year out of college, that?s not bad 20 years ago.

APE: What?s that in US dollars?

Jake: $40,000.00

Another big break was in December of 1990. I got a call from Dylan Jones who was the editor of Arena. He said, ?Do you want to shoot Gary Oldman?? I was like ?yeah? until I found out it was at a restaurant and it was lunch with Gary Oldman. He would be sitting there eating his lunch being interviewed.

I said, ?Oh, all right, yeah, yeah.? It?s tough. At a restaurant. I didn?t know how to use light or anything. I had no system. So I turned up at this job to meet Gary at the restaurant.

I was first there, and when he walked in I introduced myself: ?Hey Gary, I?m Jake. I?m here to take your picture.? He said, ?What do you mean? They didn?t tell me there was a photographer. I was like, ?Oh, OK.? I said, ?OK, I totally understand. Can I just tell you something? I just left college three months ago. This is one of my first jobs, and I know that they told me they want to put you on the cover, but they don?t have a cover shoot. Will you do a cover shoot with me?? He said, ?Yeah, call me next week. Come to my flat and we?ll do it. I?ll give you half an hour.?

APE: You talked him into it?

Jake: Yeah. I met him in Chelsea. It was a shitty day. I took my friend, not an assistant and we put a piece of white cardboard up on a children?s playground in Chelsea. No groomer, no stylist, shot a head shot of Gary Oldman, and they put it on the cover. [laughs]

APE: Amazing.

Jake: That was a huge deal for me, first of all that I talked him into it, second that he was an actor who I thought was fantastic. I loved ?Sid and Nancy? and ?Prick Up Your Ears? and it was the cover of Arena. The main magazines I wanted to work for at the time were Face and Arena.

APE: That?s great. You never assisted anyone?

Jake: I did one day with Kevin Davies. He said to me, ?Why do you want to do this? You are already shooting.? I remember, I assisted him on a test and I had to go to do a job in the afternoon so I had to leave to shoot Gabriel Byrne [laughs]. But he was cool about it.

APE: One day of assisting your entire career?

Jake: Yeah, that was it. I went to see another photographer who was well known and I remember, I said, can I assist you? He said, ?Fuck off, you?re a rival now.? Those are his exact words to me.

APE: [laughs]

Jake: I?d done one job so I didn?t consider myself a rival. I thought he was amazing.

APE: You?ve probably met a lot of assistants and young aspiring photographers who go to school here. It?s completely different.

Jake: I dread to think what it?s like now to try and start. It must be so hard.

APE: Do you feel like back then the industry was tighter?

Jake: London was kind of small. I think there were a group of magazines that were looking at younger photographers and I think the fact that there weren?t that many photo studios and everybody used to shoot at Click Studios meant there was a sort of camaraderie.

I remember hanging out in the office at Click and Glen Luchford was there and he said, ?I sent in one print.? and I was like ?What do you mean one print?? I would send in the whole shoot. I had no idea that you should send in an edit. I was completely clueless. I thought, ?What are you talking about? That?s ridiculous. How arrogant to suppose that you know more than the art director?. But of course he was right.

APE: So you just picked up little pieces here and there. How to run your business and how to do an edit?

Jake: Yeah, it was a very gradual process. I think in those first few years I was very fortunate that I got to shoot a lot of people who were about to become very famous. Quentin Tarantino, Beck, kd lang, Tricky, for example. So I quite quickly had a celebrity book going. Being trusted to shoot big names, and getting publicist approval is a huge hurdle to jump for any new photographer. But there was also a time where I would shoot anything that was offered to me. I was shooting some terrible pictures, and taking terrible commissions. Because first of all, I didn?t know how to say no. I didn?t have a cell phone and there was no email. If they called you and you picked up the phone?

APE: You had to have an excuse if you didn?t want to shoot.

Jake: Yeah, it was really hard to say no, plus the money was good. I was happy to be asked to do stuff. After a couple of years, I had a conversation with somebody at Arena. I think it was one of the fashion editors I worked with on a job. She?s said, ?Why are you doing all these shit jobs, because you?re watering down what you?re good at.?

Then I got to know Grant Scott, who was a great mentor to me, and the Art Director at British Elle. I went into see him after I?d been working maybe two years. He said, ?You?re at the point now you?ve got to decide. Do you want to be a working photographer or a good photographer? A working photographer does what they?re offered, a good photographer picks and chooses.?

That was a real big moment for me, because I was only 25.

APE: Then you start turning down jobs?

Jake: Literally that week, I had accepted a job shooting some corny feature for a Women?s magazine, about women who have affairs with their personal trainers or something. The guy called me to talk about the shoot and I said, ?Look, I can?t do that job for you.? I had to make a decision and not do this shit anymore, and stick to it. So I said no to that. It was the end of 1992. The economy went to shit and literally I didn?t work for six months. [laughs]

APE: Oh my God. Did you freak out?

Jake: Yeah, I was really freaked out.

APE: You were thinking that was horrible advice.

Jake: No, I thought it was good advice but I was still freaking out.

APE: You didn?t know if you could make a career turning down bad jobs.

Jake: Yeah, yeah.

APE: So what happened? Six months, hardly any work?

Jake: I was making like three, four hundred a month.

APE: Still living at home?

Jake: Yeah, I was fortunate to be still living at home, thank God. Gradually it started to pick up again and I found new routes into different clients, being a bit more picky.

Then Lee Swillingham became art director at The Face and he started to call me fairly regularly to shoot portraits.

In late 93 he called and said, ?Do you want to go to the worst area of Los Angeles to shoot Ice Cube?? ?Yes.? [laughs] I had been to America twice on holiday. Suddenly I was flying to LA to shoot Ice Cube. I went with the writer to South Central and we had a 20-minute shoot with Ice Cube on the street.

APE: How was it?

Jake: It was incredible. I?d never been to L.A. and we sat with him and he kind of started doing the hip-hop gangster poses. And I said, oh no, I don?t really want to do that, can we do something a bit more?And he went, ?you mean, a bit more reflective.? I was like, yes, exactly. So, he sat on the curb and he just hung out.

APE: And you made great pictures.

Jake: Yes, they were good pictures, and then about three or four months later they asked me to shoot The Beastie Boys again in L.A., so I went out with a writer and we went to Mike D?s house. And actually, that?s one of the pictures [pointing to a picture on the studio wall] and that?s the print that The Face ran. I think in that period I shot for The Face literally every month for about three years.

APE: You already have your style here. It?s in that picture.

Jake: I guess it?s a kind of very loose, not overly directed. You kind of work with them just to let their personality do the talking. And they were really funny guys. They were into it, just pissing around for an hour or two.

APE: So, you just kind of fell into that style?

Jake: I think, yes.

APE: It just happened, there was nothing planned about it?

Jake: In the beginning I would look at a book of photographs I liked the night before a shoot, going, what am I going to do, what am I going to do? But that didn?t really work on the day, as all my preconceived ideas went out the window. So I just think, not consciously, that I would go in and suss out the location, then meet and chat to who I was shooting and see where it went. But I talk too much and I?d start talking and kind of see what happens; try and get into a situation where something might happen.

APE: You talk too much, that?s part of your style.

Jake: That?s funny you should say that, because my wife just said, oh, you?re doing the interview today, don?t ramble.

APE: [laughs]

Jake: You know, I just talk and talk and talk.

APE: Every single shoot?

Jake: Yes, if they respond. [laughs]

APE: What happens if they don?t?

Jake: It?s harder. I mean, you can work in silence, but it?s easier if they respond or start talking back. But I remember reading a David Bailey quote where he said he maintained a constant stream of encouragement and I think I do try to do that.

APE: I?ve never been on set with you, but now your pictures make a lot more sense now that you say that. Is that nervous energy, the talking?

Jake: When I do a shoot, the hour before the shoot is the worst hour of my life. I don?t want to be there. I want to go home. I?ll do anything to be on the other side of it. So I think it?s partly nervous energy.

Then suddenly you?re confronted with for example Robert De Niro. He?s walking into the room and you?ve got to do something to get the shot. I?ve shot him a couple of times. It?s intimidating.

APE: He?s not a talkative guy?

Jake: He?s not a very talkative guy.

APE: You?re just talking to him the whole time?

Jake: Talking at him. I?m trying to get something out of him. But what I?ve realized with he doesn?t want to hear how great of an actor he is. He knows how fucking good of an actor he is like all these guys. You don?t want to go in there ? although it?s difficult sometimes if you?re a fan ? and say, ?Oh my god. I love you.? But I think the bigger the star, the smaller the talk. Talk about the weather, or what movie you saw last night, or what you?re doing for the holidays.

APE: You?ve done this for a long time but when you started, did you have some things in your head that you knew you were going to talk about? Or do you just read the newspaper and you know what?s going on?

Jake: Sometimes it?s just current affairs. If they talked to the editor or stylist beforehand, you just gauge what they were talking about and what their level of interest is, how talkative they are. Often I ask the PR, ?What?s a good thing to talk about? What does he not want to talk about??

I don?t overly research the people I?m shooting, but obviously I?ll read and find out something.

It?s funny. Since I?ve had kids, I talk endlessly about them. I?m boring. I?m the fucking worst dad bore. I love talking about other people?s kids because it?s a human thing. It?s not about work.

APE: So if they have kids, you?re talking about kids for hours?

Jake: And then if they want to talk about their kids, I love to hear about what their kids do and we can compare notes.

I say, ?What have you got?? And they say, ?I?ve got two girls.?

?How old are they??

?13 and 17.?

I?m like, ?Oh my god. I?ve got two girls. They?re seven and ten.? And they?re like, ?Oh geez. You?re in trouble.?

If they?re willing to be personal, great. If they?re not?

APE: Does that make better pictures or does it matter?

Jake: I don?t think it really matters. I think it makes the session easier. I shot a big job last week for Sony, and I was editing with the client and he said to me that he noticed as the shoot went on, I just wear them down. You just keep going and talking until they drop and give in, which I had never analyzed as a reality.

APE: That always happens? Do you get your best pictures after you?ve worn them down? They don?t happen at the beginning of the shoot? Is that pretty common with you?

Jake: Sometimes at the beginning of the shoot and sometimes it?s five minutes from the end of the shoot. I haven?t really looked at the flow. But sometimes the shoot is only minutes long, so there?s not much time.

APE: That was just something that occurred to you recently?

Jake: It occurred to me that it was a possibility, but I hadn?t really thought about it until this guy said it last week. Maybe it?s true. I don?t know.

APE: We?ve jumped ahead to your style which I really like. I want to talk more about it, but how do you get from London to here?

Jake: I started coming out here to work and then I had two friends who lived in the West Village. They?re from England. They?d gone out to get jobs in New York and so I started coming out and staying with them to do appointments, to try and get work here with varying degrees of success because it was really hard as a foreigner. You come into this new market and you?re all excited. ?I?m going to get loads of work.? And of course you go back to London and they forget about you immediately. This was in 1995. It was pre-Internet and pre-email.

I think the big break was when I had been coming and going for a year or two and then Matt Berman and John Kennedy Jr. started ?George? magazine. Matt Berman was his creative director. He hired Bridget Cox, who was his photo director and then Matt and Bridget picked up every English magazine. They went through The Face, ID and Arena with a fine toothed comb and picked the photographers from England that they wanted to work with.

APE: Why would they pick only photographers in England?

Jake: I don?t know. It was just a thing. I think they thought it would maybe bring in a sensibility and those magazines were at their peak. They used American photographers as well. Of course there are really good photographers here, but they decided to get a little school of London based photographers they?d fly out to shoot.

APE: They?d fly you into the States?

Jake: It was incredible. Before the magazine launched, Matt called me up and said, ?Do you want to come out and shoot for us?? He flew me out. I stayed with friends. In fact, they may have put me in a hotel for the week. I hung out with Matt in his office and we?d shoot the shit, chat about photography, design, art. He?s a great guy.

And then he sent me to Colorado to shoot a senator. I shot some portraits in New York and then I flew back to London. And then he?d fly me out again. I did Kofi Annan. Newt Gingrich with a lion. I did a bunch of people. They did these themed issues. I did like the ten top men in politics or something like that. They?d fly me all over the country and it was a real education.

So suddenly I was getting a ton of shoots here and I was getting a bit more exposure. And gradually over the period from the beginning of 1996 to 1999, I came here more and more until I was here for three or four months a year. I was picking up interesting portraits in London for magazines like W, and I got a great break when Kathy Ryan at The New York Times Magazine hired me to shoot a cover of Tom Hanks and Ben Affleck. I shot a series of covers for them from 1998 onwards. It was starting to get stupid because I was constantly away. I would literally get home, get a phone call and get back on an airplane. It wasn?t making my personal life particularly easy.

My wife and I had been talking about moving to New York so in the middle of 1998 we thought, ?Fuck it. We?ll move to New York.? She?s a really talented designer and got a job working for The Gap. We got married on March 27, 1999. We went to Saint Lucia for a week for our honeymoon we flew back on the third of April and on the fourth of April, we moved to New York.

APE: Big life change.

Jake: We literally left everything.

APE: You felt you needed to move to New York to have a successful career?

Jake: I think my experience in being here and then going back and not getting any phone calls was like that Andy Warhol saying, ?Success is a job in New York.? And I thought that was where it was at and if I wanted to shoot big names for big clients that is where I needed to be. I wasn?t a fashion photographer. I wasn?t a product photographer or a car photographer and in England that?s a big market. I wasn?t particularly technical and a lot of the advertising imagery in the UK was very precise and that?s not me. I thought there was a lot of personality based stuff for me to shoot here.

And it was financial. My first big job in New York was in the end of 1998. I got a big job for IBM where we shot here, in London and in Tokyo. It was just before we moved. I got that ad job which paid a lot.

APE: So you saw that most of your potential clients were here.

Jake: It was a leap of faith. It was partly financial, but partly opportunity. All the celebs are here. If you shot a celeb in London, it was in a hotel room for 20 minutes on a press junket.

One of the first jobs I did here after moving and I suddenly thought, ?OK. This is working out.? It was for Nancy Iacoi at ?Premiere? who called me and asked me to shoot Johnny Depp for a cover, so we flew out to Frank Lloyd Wright House in LA. Now, that?s a shoot. [laughs]

APE: That?s an amazing shoot.

Jake: It?s not 20 minutes tucked in somewhere. It was amazing to suddenly be here doing all that stuff.

APE: And you were shooting big time editorials, shooting for tons of magazines?

Jake: I was shooting for ?The New York Times Magazine?, ?Premiere,? ?Newsweek,? ?Esquire,? ?Entertainment Weekly?, ?Details? a lot of editorial.

APE: I want to get into the promo stuff and the custom portfolio books because these are really interesting. Let?s get into these books. When did you first start making the books?

Jake: ?97 was the first one.

APE: Describe the process. Why did you start making them like this with the color photocopies?

Jake: When I started working for foreign magazines from London, it was pre-email, pre-Internet. You would FedEx off the edit, so I was cutting out these pictures realizing that as I didn?t have two sets of contacts necessarily, that I would never see them again, and to have a record of what the hell I had sent them I made color copies and they were sitting around in a pile.

Then I said, ?Hmm. I?ll stick them in a book.? So I started cutting them out and making these collages and arrangements which I think because I?d been to art school and done a lot of painting, drawing stuff that it was second nature to have a sketch book. It was kind of the first photographic manifestation of a sketchbook.

And within a few weeks, I started to get a thick little set of pictures. There were pages and pages of this stuff. I had always been frustrated with my portfolios because they were one or two prints from each sessions and it didn?t really reflect the shoot.

APE: You wanted to show the whole take?

Jake: Yes because I was confident at this point. It was following off my conversation with Grant Scott who said, ?Do you want to be a working photographer or a good photographer?? He showed me a shoot that one of the guys who worked he?d with, I can?t remember who it was, had done with Antonio Banderas and this guy had everything. He had close ups, wide shots, back and white, color, different outfits.

And he said, ?How long do you think they had to do this shoot?? I said, ?It looks like all day.? And he said, ?No. They had two hours.? He said, ?You?ve got to cover more than one shot because what if you submit a color headshot and the magazine has already got 20 color headshots in this issue and they want a black and white wide shot? You?ve got to think about that.?

And I had never considered it. I was too dumb. This was early on in my career. I was like, ?Shit. He?s absolutely right.? So I started shooting around and trying really to explore and shoot how he told me to, for him particularly. So I had all these shots that never saw the light of day.

APE: And that is also a signature thing for you is how many setups you do.

Jake: I guess it became that way just trying to give a variety.

APE: And is part of that you just wearing them out? Or are you just trying to find something?

Jake: It?s like, ?I?ve got that. Let?s do something different.? I?m always thinking that there?s a better shot here that I haven?t seen yet.

APE: Back to the books.

Jake: I?d put these together and suddenly it became a tool. Not just for reviewing the work but for getting work. Art directors seemed to respond very well to it. They loved to see the variety, to see the outtakes, to feel it?s something that?s personal, which it is.

APE: It?s very unusual. I don?t think I know anyone who does it this way but again it just fits with your personality so well. And you did it out of necessity.

Jake: Yes. I had wound up the first one and then I think ? ?We need two of these,? so I?d do two. It got to a point where I think on one round we did six of them. It took weeks. It?s really labor intensive.

APE: And you?ve done one of these every year.

Jake: Yeah, pretty much.

APE: It?s amazing. That?s amazing just to have that record of your career.

Jake: It?s a good review. It?s good to look back just to try and find stuff. I?ve got a client that I am about to shoot for, and they?re looking for pictures of night views of cities so I just went through them last night and pulled out a couple. It?s good to review and find stuff.

APE: Night views of cities?

Jake: Yeah, it?s for a vodka client.

APE: Oh, to go in with your other shots?

Jake: Yes, so that we don?t have to shoot it because we?ve only got two days to shoot this thing.

APE: What about as far as promos and stuff? Did you just do the normal kind of promo cards?

Jake: Yeah, I did promo cards, although I think they?re of somewhat limited value. But, you?d hope to go into someone?s office and see one pinned up on the wall.

APE: [laughs]

Jake: It was brutal back then. It?s so much easier now to get pictures out there because you either have a website, blog, or send them in an email and people are hopefully interested to get them.

APE: Right. Yeah, let?s talk about that next, that evolution into The Daily Chessum. It makes a lot more sense to me now, meeting you and seeing and remembering the proliferation of images that you produce. Doing something daily, that makes a lot of sense now.

Jake: There are a hundred pages in each of these books. So that became an end in itself and a promotional tool that came out of nowhere and seemed to pay off. But then getting a website took a while and once you?ve got it up and running it?s hard to update, it takes a real commitment. I was talking to my agent and she was saying ?Maybe you should do a blog.? I thought ?Yeah, that?s great, but no writing.?

APE: [laughs]

Jake: I?m not disparaging any blogs where people write about their experiences, but I didn?t want to do that. I didn?t want to demystify the process. There?s a lot of stuff out there that you shouldn?t tell anybody. You know what I mean?

APE: Yeah. If you want to reach photo editors and art directors and art buyers, then you need to be showing pictures and not talking about the process.

Jake: Yeah as a consumer of some of those blogs, it?s interesting to read that stuff because it creates a kind of kinship and it?s good to know you?re not the only one dealing with that crap. But yeah, I don?t want to divulge that information. I just wanted to put pictures out there regularly to show what I was up to. It?s easy to do, look at, immediate. It?s my visual diary.

APE: It?s just another promotional vehicle.

Jake: Yes, and I was really happy that Tumblr sent me a little email saying, oh, we love your blog, we want to put it on our spotlight page. Which overnight, I went from, 500 followers to like, 3,000, and then the next month it was 5,000, and up to 22,000 followers.

APE: I talked to you a year or longer ago about it, and you were saying ?I don?t know where this is going to go, but I feel like I need to participate.?

Jake: Yes.

APE: And you said you?re making a mistake not trying some of these new tools out.

Jake; True, and I?m not an innovator in that sense because I waited so long to jump on the blog bandwagon.

APE: No, but you took the time to see all the other blogs and make a decision, how you wanted yours to work.

Jake: Yes, and I thought, if you don?t update, you lose traffic so, I thought every day I?d put up one image, because putting up more would be a sheer burden to come up with more good pictures. Do you know what I mean? I didn?t want to dip into the archive too much. I wanted it to be something current. I want it to reflect what I was up to within that time frame. And obviously, it?s a kind of a cheat, because when you know you?re going to be busy, I queue up my 10 ahead or sometimes 20 ahead if I know I?m going to be crazed.

APE: And it?ll do it automatically.

Jake: Yes, it updates once a day, every day.

APE: Right, that?s perfect.

Jake: And then yesterday I got a bunch of PDFs of something that just came out, so I pushed everything back a few days and dropped those in to come in sooner.

APE: And, the other thing that you told me was with your shoots there?s all these outtakes that don?t make it in the magazine.

Jake: You have to be careful with that because you can diminish the value of the outtakes. Or upset a publicist. Clients want to pay for exclusives.

APE: Well, I think it?s brilliant.

Jake: Thanks. But, yes, it?s just a really cool way of making you work as well and making you take pictures. If you haven?t shot a job for a couple of days and you need to post, then it?s time to go out and shoot some pictures.

APE: I want to talk just really quick about the transition to digital. Obviously, you?re not shooting very much film anymore.

Jake: No.

APE: But then you were saying how much you like digital.

Jake: Yes, I?m psyched about it.

APE: When did you finally embrace?

Jake: I haven?t shot an ad job on film for five years. And I haven?t seen a reason why I would have to. So in the last four years.

APE: Once you embraced it you felt like, ?This is amazing.?

Jake: It?s like a revelation. I?d read yesterday some photographer who went fully digital in 2001. I went, ?Fucking hell. That was pretty early to really go 100 percent digital.?

APE: Some people don?t love the film and the printing. They never got into that. Obviously all that time in the darkroom, you love that process.

Jake: Years of printing black and white and processing film. Seeing it, holding it up in the darkroom for the first time. There?s a huge thrill. There always was in seeing the print come up, and actually going through the craft of washing it, drying it. All that stuff.

Letting that go took a while. But I think I went through a transitional period. I had a darkroom in London, but I never had one here, and as I got busier I let it go. I was also shooting a lot of color and I never printed my own color. Plus the printers I used were better at it than I was. But I?ll admit I was one of those sanctimonious douchebags back in the day who was like, ?Oh my God, they never print. How can you call yourself a photographer? How disgusting.? When I had the kids, I didn?t want to spend a night in the darkroom. I wanted to go home.

APE: What was the revelation once you really got into it?

Jake: I had let control go to an extent with the printing and retouching when I was all film. But when I started shooting digital I felt I claimed it back. Getting the images to where I wanted them, even something as simple as making something black and white, felt like giving me a creative outlet within the medium that I kind of lost track of. I?d let that go for a bit and it was a revelation to get it back. Do you know what I mean?

APE: Yeah. I think that completes the circle. Thanks for your time.

Jake: No problem.

by A Photo Editor on October 22, 2012 ? 7 comments


Source: http://www.aphotoeditor.com/2012/10/22/jake-chessum-interview/

all star weekend 2012 giada de laurentiis howard hughes nationwide race wanderlust gone tyler perry good deeds